'ought', 'can', and Practical Reasons 1

نویسنده

  • Clayton Littlejohn
چکیده

As intuitive as OIC might seem, we should acknowledge that the arguments offered in its support often do not warrant the sort of confidence many of us have in the principle. For example, friends of OIC often say that the principle is needed to explain certain linguistic behaviors. 3 Suppose Smith sees Jones sitting in a chair and Jones tells Smith that he has just been robbed. 'You ought to call the police', says Smith. When Jones tells him that he cannot because he has been tied to the chair, it is natural for Smith to recommend some alternative course of action. The reason, some say, is that in learning that Jones cannot get out of his chair to call the police, Smith learns from this alone that his initial remark was mistaken. In saying 'You ought to ask someone to help untie you' he recommends an alternative course of action and tries to correct his first remark. If only it were this simple. Some chalk this up to conversational implicature. In discovering that his advisee cannot follow his advice, his offer of additional advice is proper because when we say someone ought to perform such and such an action, we would violate conversational maxims if we advise someone to perform an action knowing they will not follow this advise. 4 Although the details of such proposals have been criticized, it is unlikely that we need OIC to explain Smith's linguistic behavior. 5 Let us change examples. Having untied Jones, Smith heads with Jones to the hardware store. In addition to getting new locks for his doors, Jones had promised his mother that he would spruce up the place. 'You ought to buy some tile for the kitchen and leave the living room as is', says Smith. Jones says that he is unwilling to leave the living room walls the same drab color they are now. 'In that case, you should paint the walls yellow', says Smith. As before, it seems that Smith will advise a new course of action in learning something about Jones. In the previous case, learning that Jones is incapable of leaving his chair leads Smith to advise Jones to call for assistance, creating the appearance that he has taken back his original advice having recognized that it was mistaken. Having urged him to call the police initially, he advises him instead to ask someone to …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Practical Reasons and Moral ‘Ought’

Morality is a source of reasons for action, what philosophers call practical reasons. Kantians say that it ‘gives’ reasons to everyone. We can even think of moral requirements as amounting to particularly strong or stringent reasons, in an effort to demystify deontological views like Kant’s, with its insistence on inescapable or ‘binding’ moral requirements or ‘oughts.’1 When we say that someon...

متن کامل

Internal Reasons and the Ought-implies-can Principle1

The task of this essay is to use the ought-implies-can principle (OIC) to clarify and defend Bernard Williams’ claim that all reasons are internal. On the interpretation offered here, the internalism/externalism controversy initiated by Williams is about the indexicality of normative practical reasons. The central question is this: Are all of our reasons anchored to our current beliefs and desi...

متن کامل

Reasoning with Moral Conflicts

Let us say that a normative conflict is a situation in which an agent ought to perform an action A, and also ought to perform an action B, but in which it is impossible for the agent to perform both A and B. Not all normative conflicts are moral conflicts, of course. It may be that the agent ought to perform the action A for reasons of personal generosity, but ought to perform the action B for ...

متن کامل

Pragmatic Encroachment and Epistemic Value

Does knowledge matter ? There are actually at least two questions behind this broad one. The first is whether the value of knowledge is independent from other epistemic values, such as the value of truth, or the value of having true beliefs. The second is whether knowledge, as an epistemic value is independent from other values, such as the good or freedom, which are practical or ethical values...

متن کامل

Oughts and Ends

As this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, ‗tis necessary that it shou'd be observ'd and explain'd' and at the same time that a reason should be given; for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it. Hume never actually asserted what has come to be called ‗Hume's Law': that you can...

متن کامل

تحلیل مفهومی تعارضات اخلاقی

In this paper, different definitions of moral conflict and moral dilemma at two levels of recognition and observing moral duties are taken into consideration and some instances of usage of conflict in physiology (conflict of stimulant and goals) and sociology(conflict of roles and norms)are mentioned. Also concepts and constraints used in the moral dilemma, especially the concept of "ought to" ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008